Quantcast
Important Stuff
Recent Comments
Thursday
21May2009

Anorexic Avant Garde - Overweight Discrimination @ Work

Aren't we just so very proud of ourselves: in a single quantum leap, or so some would have us believe, we've eradicated all forms of overt prejudice. So be it race, religion, ethnicity, color, sexual persuasion, etc., being against (or for) someone for these reasons alone just isn't considered acceptable any longer. And, while this can seem very all-American and an unassailable virtue that even the European Union would be happy about, the reality is that we are really kinda ambivalent about the whole thing. I mean, there's really no way to reconcile being for equality yet also touting affirmative action. Sure, this can be parsed and rationalized in a million ways, but let's just leave that up to the gliberals, the power elite to justify this type of social schizophrenia. And, BTW, they (like the NT Slimes, the Rockefeller Foundation, Mayor 'Mike' Bloomberg, etc. ad nauseum) are real good at having you and I pay-in every way so that they can continue to blithely pursue their social engineering objectives.

We, however, have more important business!

Ironically, and for all of our self-proclaimed modern day liberalism, it seems that there is one prejudice that still stinkingly lurks behind every office door, and each cubicle semi-wall. A hatred, a disgust that is not only acceptable, but very fashionable. And that's the way heavy, fat, and overweight people are perceived and treated-every day and in every way in the workplace. The school yard rejections they suffered have never, ever ended for these folks. Paradoxically, the new wave of bosses, and other assorted exec-types are, in this age of plenty, for the most part, anorexic. You know them, the earthy, crunchy, vegan urbanists who flaunt their gauntness by, of all things, wearing basic black so as to further accentuate what they see as almost imperial slimness. Hey, if they want to starve themselves, that's their business.

But when they claim moral superiority over others who happen to weigh more than, say, 125 lbs., they are nothing more than bigots. That's right, they behave no better than the symbolic 'Joe Six Pack', who curses everyone that's different than him, as he rides the subway to his job in a local factory. The reality is that workers who are perceived as overweight are hired less often than their thinner conterparts, are less likely to be promoted and in general are treated with less consideration and respect. These people are unfairly maligned as 'lazy', 'crude', 'irresponsible' and 'classless'by the current group of younger and thinner bosses. In fact, the anorexics revel in the moral indignation they direct towards the overweight, blaming them for everything from the nation's rising health care costs to green gas emissions and everything in between. The truth that the heavy, and yes, the fat, they are not just like the rest of us, they ARE us.

If we continue to allow the current spate of skinny bosses to get away with treating overweight people as shabbily as they now do, we need to ask ourselves, who's next?

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

« When Gen Y Just Doesn't Fit In | Main | WorkBlast: Expand Your Network »

Reader Comments (11)

discrimination @ work is far more prevalent than anyone would like to admit. interesting take, Kipling. i especially enjoyed this post coming from a physically fit specimen like yourself!

you're right about these human sticks wearing black all of the time. what's up with that?
May 21, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterAndrew G.R.
Let's take a triage approach...They wear black because:

>It's always so ever fashionable

>It emphasizes their 'thinness'

>It gives off a tough vibe, like "don't mess with me"

Any other readers have any theories about this?????????????
May 22, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterVK
You juxtapose fat people only with the far extreme, the anorexic or trendy/vegan dieter, instead of looking at the majority of healthy individuals who pay moderate attention to what/how much they eat and how much they exercise. In doing so, this post appears as an attempt to reverse-discriminate, in theory against the polar opposite of the obese. Which is fine, anorexia should not be socially acceptable, since anorexic individuals are in worse health than the obese. But what you have achieved rather is a reverse-discrimination against all "non-fat" people, which includes all of those average-weight-Joe's in the world. All anorexics are thin, not all thin people are anorexics. See the difference?

Let's face some facts, fat people generally ARE lazy, or unmotivated. Hence allowing themselves to get or remain fat. Either exercise, assess what you eat, or both. It doesn't take too much effort, it doesn't take an eating disorder, and it doesn't take the kind of extreme dedication that weight-loss TV shows would have you believe. There's also a difference between overweight and overFAT. If you're 6'0 and weigh 220 because you lift every morning before coming to work, there's a good chance you're healthy. But if you're 6'0 and you weigh 220 with 30+% body fat because you watch TV before work and after dinner, then you're probably not fine.

Back to my point, laziness and lack of motivation are COMPLETELY FAIR reasons for discrimination, especially in the work-place. If one is unwilling to properly assess his or her diet to eliminate the nightly cauldron of macaroni-and-cheese, then what makes him or her more willing to properly assess any other work? A food-intake:exercise-output ratio for one's own body vs. a cost:benefit ratio for the new parts coming in from China? What's really the difference?

I challenge you this, find me other reasons people get fat. Then tell me if those are not worth discriminating against in the work-place. Because with no exceptions, laziness and lack of motivation should be discriminated against (actually if you can find an example where laziness should be rewarded, then please include that in any response). A back injury leading to obesity would be more excusable in the cubicle world, but not in the blue-collar world. And so you don't think I left this out, genetic pre-dispositions can be overcome. Those with genetic pre-dispositions to obesity shouldn't expect to achieve <10% body fat, but there's no reason to be >30%.

Other important notes. My seemingly harsh response is not (outwardly) health-related. While not the world's best study, [http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/168/15/1617] reports that 32% of obese people have normal cardiovascular fitness. I would love to argue that the 70% of fat people have poor fitness because they're FAT, while the 23% of normal-weight adults were metabolically abnormal because they're poorly nourished, but this assumes a lot about people's diets and backgrounds. Also it raises the "are the fat people not fat for the same dietary reasons that the normal-weight people are poorly nourished" question, to which there is no simple answer.

Nor is this cost-of-medicine related. If treating the diseases of fat people cost more than average-weight people, but average-weight people on average live longer than fat people, then in the end the medical costs will be similar. Surely there's a study that assesses these numbers.
June 22, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterGL
"All anorexics are thin, not all thin people are anorexic." by GL. Not all lazy people are fat, and not all obese people are lazy or lack motivation. The result of obesity has many reasons some are genetic, as mentioned, some medical, and some are by the choices of food and exercise one makes.

I would say lack of food knowledge is another. Most people are not well educated about what they eat or how much of it to eat. With portions increasing via restaurants and food being processed or in some cases recreated with different artificial flavors, it is easy to see why people very easily gain weight. I truly believe educating people (especially our children) about the following:
1) benefits of natural organic food and the dangers of some of the ingredients in processed foods and
2) portion amounts is critical to helping people be healthy.
To learn some more about food, I highly recommend people to read Mastering Your Metabolism by Jill Michaels (she has no idea of this post).

Going back to the original article neither "fat" nor "skinny" people should be rashly judged or discriminated against.
June 23, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterLC
You're completely right that lack of food knowledge is a major problem. I originally considered this factor when constructing my original argument. I threw it out however because I believe that that is just a side-effect of laziness. Everybody should put effort into maintenance of their own diet, including research about the foods you eat. If one has gotten fat, and realizes it, one ought to do something. Especially with the current crusade against obesity led by those anorexics mentioned above. Even if the anorexics are not in the right, obese people should at least be aware that there are definitely negative health consequences linked and attributed to obesity.

But my main point is that lazy people SHOULD be discriminated against. That is, those who are not self-motivated and lack the fortitude or will-power to overcome a situation are not ideal for the workplace - ANY workplace. Pencil-pushing jobs obviously have to lower their standards and hire some people of this lower-caliber human, since the brightest and most motivated usually aren't willing to sit at a desk permanently filling out paperwork for a boss as a means of income. However, that doesn't mean they should be allowed to fester in their ineptitude. Efficiency consultants would have something to say here about "the dregs of the system." I'm not saying that all fat people are lazy, or that all lazy people are fat. But there is definitely a trend, a positive correlation. I'm saying that the majority of so-called causes of and excuses for obesity can be traced back to laziness or lack of self-motivation.
June 28, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterGL
Wow, GL; did some fattie whoop your ass as a child or what? Seriously, the venom in your posts is apparent. So you have not encountered lazy/unmotivated people who were not fat? I certainly have. While you state that
"lazy people SHOULD be discriminated against", and you later say that "I'm not saying that all fat people are lazy, or that all lazy people are fat", it seems quite apparent that you believe that all fat people are lazy.
August 4, 2009 | Unregistered Commentergc
I think the problem in GL's post is the generalization. While I do agree with some of the points made (because I too feel that many obese or overly fat people are indeed lazy) I certainly don't think they all are! I don't think that those who were gifted with good geneology and therefore are not overly fat or thin are always educating themselves well either. Unfortunately, many of us have less than desireable body shapes and I don't think too fat or too thin makes us lazy or not. One could also argue that anorexics are too lazy to eat...but my point is...people are people and we're trying too hard to categorize them here. In closing though...and at the risk of sounding completely contradictory here...there does appear to be a tendency for overweight people to lean toward the lazy side...
August 23, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterKellie
I think the problem in GL's post is the generalization. While I do agree with some of the points made (because I too feel that many obese or overly fat people are indeed lazy) I certainly don't think they all are! I don't think that those who were gifted with good geneology and therefore are not overly fat or thin are always educating themselves well either. Unfortunately, many of us have less than desireable body shapes and I don't think too fat or too thin makes us lazy or not. One could also argue that anorexics are too lazy to eat...but my point is...people are people and we're trying too hard to categorize them here. In closing though...and at the risk of sounding completely contradictory here...there does appear to be a tendency for overweight people to lean toward the lazy side...
August 23, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterKellie
GL:

While I think you had some valid points in your comment, I was very put off by your tone - judgmental and blaming As a therapist who has worked for 20 years with people who have serious food issues, I react to your rather simplistic observations, particular the "lazy" paradigm. Often there are underlying behavioral/emotional triggers to both over- and under-eating. So you might want to try being more compassionate. I suspect your attitude is readily perceived by your co-workers.
August 25, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterNancy
Overweight is the major problem in the world .It can be controlled from yoga. One should practice it under the guidance of a yoga teacher.
September 7, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterDavid Wolfe
You must be fat
December 1, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterSkinny and proud

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.